Access Tech Today and Tomorrow

Coming soon - accessleaks.org the home of accessibility news, gossip and rumour !

This is partly my personal website for accessibility news and views.

It is also the home of the Access Collective Podcast and AT of the Week

New projects are added as and when I and others think of think of them

It links to all of my web presence and offers a route to sharing information on all aspects of Assistive Technology and Access Technologies for people with a disability

Update 13/05/2011

New newsletter

Update 18/04/2011

New AT of the week - Otomata

New Blog - Access forAll, its a never ending story

Update 08/04/2011

New AT of the week - Calibre DRM free ebooks 

New Blog item - Happy Birthday Twitter

New Newsletter - CSUN 2011 Special

Update 10/03/2011

New AT of the Week - FixtheWeb AT ToolBar 

New Fixtheweb Newsletter special edition published

Update 04/03/2011

New AT of the week - The friend mail

New Newsletter published

Update 19/02/2011

New Newsletter Published

New AT of the week - Punch and Pet

 

DaveBanesAccess Blog

The Kindle Fire, changing the gameplan for access ?

Posted September 30, 2011

The new Kindle Fire was released this week to a fascinating mixture of responses, pundits thought it was great, apple Fanboyz derided it and the blind community attacked its lack of access for the visually impaired with righteous indignation and anger, this following the same community lauding Steve Jobs for apples work on providing access.

I dont know to what extent the community has had its hands on the kindle fire - many of the pundits were not able to get hands on, but lets assume that the new device has little or no TTS functionality.

Let me be upfront - Im a bit of a Kindle Fan - my ebook reader is a tech I use every single day and I love it - as an expatriate living overseas the access it provides me to a widely ranging bookstore is a significant part of my quality of life. But it is the channel that it provides to content that is important - not the device per se

Which leads us to our debate around accessibility, whilst we may well be annoyed that such a new and low cost device does not have full screenreading functionality, this may well be the wrong debate. Our question perhaps should be, is the content that Amazon distributes, available to all people regardless of needs. Kindle has a hugely diverse range of channels to its content with software (free) for every major platform to read content as well as the traditional reader and now the Fire.

I havent tested all of these but Im going to look at which of these work well with screenreaders and offer support to blind and people with low vision. Because perhaps the debate now should perhaps be - does Amazon (or apple or whoever) offer access to the same content for no greater cost than a person who is not yet disabled in anyway ?

This is more or less the case for other forms of accessibility, access to a building doesn't require that every entrance has a ramp, access to disney rides doesn't require that every cart is wheelchair accessible and access to the cinema doesnt require that every seat is removable for wheelchair access. In all cases there is a compromise that is being offered.

I imagine that the first response Im likely to get is that all people should be able to use all channel as a matter of having a range of  choices. Im not entirely convinced by this, my choices are limited by a range of factors, including cost, but also my language, my age (and increasingly weak hearing and sight) and my location. Like all users I have to weigh up all of these factors in making a decision and it may well be that other members of my family would opt for a different way of accessing Amazon to the one that suits me. 

I do understand the frustration of the blind community, but the debate needs to be mature. The Kindle Fire may not be a solution for people with a visual impairment, I dont know - what I do know is that a lightweight reader for books and other media is helpful for people with conditions such as arthritis, a simple touch and  go interface works for people with learning difficulties or seniors and that Amazon content with subtitles is a valued service for the deaf.

Amazon needs to savvy up to these issues and be clear on the routes it is offering to its content for people with a variety of needs, but perhaps those of us in the accessibility world need to be thinking increasingly of promotion of access to content across a matrix of options, rather than each device independently.

Access for All? It’s a never ending story,

Posted April 18, 2011

Earlier this year I had the opportunity to travel to Orlando in the American state of Florida for a major assistive technology conference. The conference was a success despite the hotel catching fire and a tornado touching down in town whilst I was there: never a dull moment in the world of access technology! But access to technology conferences are not what take most people to Orlando. Most visitors travel to visit some of the world’s best theme parks and I was no exception. I visited Disney’s Magic Kingdom and left impressed with how Disney has risen to the challenge of turning a 47 square mile attraction, into a visit that anyone will remember, regardless of whether they have a disability or not.

Upon my arrival, I was greeted by key personnel working on access issues at Disney. Before taking me on a tour of the park, they gave me some of the history to Disney’s commitment to making a visit magical for any visitor. Early photos of the park show Walt Disney himself greeting children in wheelchairs as they take a tour. This established a culture of accessibility from the early days of the internationally acclaimed theme park.

The area where Disney is excelling today are:

1. Accessible Rides

Most people visit Disney World to go on the rides. They are a huge part of the experience and without them visitors might feel that they had missed out in major way. Across almost all rides, great care was taken to think about how users with disabilities would board, be seated and leave the ride. Special pods had been design on many rides which allowed wheelchairs to enter the ride directly without the need to transfer to different seating. If a transfer was needed, the employees or “cast” as Disney likes to call them, could halt the ride to allow extra time. In more recent times this had changed, by creating an additional loop on rides where pods for disabled guests could be withdrawn from the ride without the need to stop the ride, rejoining the ride as the gap in the succession of pods came around again. It was a great feature which allowed guests with a disability to take all the time they needed boarding, without disrupting the experience of others and without feeling that they were being “judged” by other guests as they got on board.

Space Mountain is one of many accessible rides at Disney World

2. Training

Even with the design of pods for users, there was still a need to help people with a disability to feel confident that they could easily board and disembark without a problem. Disney had invested in a ride where people with disabilities could practice getting on and off the ride, increasing their confidence when they got to the front of the queues for real.

3. Accessible Transport

Disney World is big. There are multiple parks spread across 47 square miles, and getting from one park to another requires a huge complex public transport system which includes buses, trams, and a widely used monorail. It would have been easy for Disney to have adopted an “equal but different” approach where special transport was available separately for people with a disability, but such approaches always struggle with availability (have you ever tried to get an accessible taxi in Doha?) So instead, the public transport system at Disney World was designed to allow people with disabilities to use the same modes of transport as everyone else. Buses had low loading access, monorails had space for wheelchairs and these carriages were clearly marked so that you could find them easily. The result was that people with a disability were as mobile between parks as they were within them. And with sidewalks with multiple curb cuts, it was easy for chairs (and baby carriages) to get around the attractions.

A Braille Map at Disney Land

4. Accessible Information

Once you were in the park, it was easy to get lost – did I mention that Disney was big? A key point around Disney World was there were usefully situated maps of the park you were in. Such maps were useful to any guest, especially in the rain when your free paper copy turns into pulp very quickly. The maps were carefully designed to include key labels available in both Braille and with universally understood symbols and icons. Good designs for people with a disability helped everyone, from those standing with a sodden map, to those with limited use of English who could easily understand the icons and symbols more than words.

5. Assistive Technology

Technology is at the heart of the Disney experience, not only in the future themed Epcot Center, but as an integral part of every ride you visit. From the cute animatronics of “It’s a Small World” to the smells, sounds and images of “Pirates of the Caribbean,” technology makes these experiences more vivid and memorable.

So perhaps it is no surprise that this experience has been brought to bear on maximising the experience for people with a disability. Upon arrival at the park, a disabled guest can request a personal PDA to carry around with them. The PDA will provide the user with captions or audio descriptions for shows and rides they visit. The descriptions explain to a blind user what the sighted person can see around them, integrating with the music, smells and effects on the ride. The captions synchronise with a show to give instructions or storyline for a deaf person. It’s a great, non intrusive experience that makes rides truly accessible.

But the devices go even further than this. They also help a disabled person to locate themselves in the park by a combination of GPS, RFID, Infrared and Bluetooth technologies that trigger messages as you wander through the park. The messages explain where you are, what is around you and what routes you should take to get to other great rides. As a non disabled person I wanted one of these as well, and it was great to hear that Disney are exploring how to make this information available via a mobile phone rather than needing a specialised device.

However, maybe the most impressive part of all of this, was not the technology, the investment or the commitment, it was that every cast member I met knew about it and knew how to make it all work. Need to know how to get on a ride in a wheelchair? Just ask! Need to know about tactile maps and accessible transport? Just Ask! Need to know where to get a loaned wheelchair or way finder? Just Ask! Now that is impressive, and it demonstrates a real understanding at Disney that providing solutions is not enough if no one helps people to use them.

A Never Ending Story?

Despite all these great features at their flagship theme park in Orlando, Disney isn’t perfect. it knows that they have work to do on making web information accessible to all, to making booking systems easier to use for the blind and for people who use keyboard control only, but to their credit they don’t brush these issues under the mat, they seem to have a plan, the commitment and the investment to address them. They know that as Disney changes and evolves, so do the ways in which access for all needs is to be delivered.

So what can we learn from Disney? What I took away is that creating a truly accessible environment is a long term plan, and one which needs constant renewal as technology changes and the opportunities for access and aspirations of disabled people grow. It has taken 11 years of commitment for Disney to get where it is today, and that journey isn’t over yet. 11 years? That’s an interesting figure for us in Qatar as we lie 11 years away from 2022, when Qatar is set to host the FIFA World Cup. Is it just possible that as the country responds to the challenges of the delivering an amazing World Cup in 2022, that we might also develop a plan and an infrastructure that means that any disabled person in Qatar, citizen, resident or guest will look back and remember the magic as well? I think we can, but that journey needs to start today because 11 years is no time at all. Thanks Mickey for reminding us what is possible!

Happy Birthday Twitter

Posted April 8, 2011

Mirrored from Digital Qatar

People all around the world will be celebrating the 5th birthday of Twitter this week. Here in Qatar, tweeps (term used to describe Twitter users) will be getting together at Aspire Park for the Doha Twestival. Like many others I can’t remember how exactly I worked prior to Twitter. How did I keep up to date with the latest trends in my field? How did I gather information for newsletters and podcasts? How did I find out what my favorite celebrities were thinking? Of all the social networks that I’ve joined, and there are many, Twitter remains my favorite.

But I want to congratulate Twitter for completely different reasons. My work involves me finding ways of meeting the needs and aspirations of people with disabilities. What I have been told often is that people with a disability want to be connected, to be part of a community, and I am happy to say Twitter has offered an opportunity to do so.

People with disabilities need access to technology, but they also need accessible technology. Many social networks haven’t designed their platforms with accessibility on their mind. Popular Web 2.0 sites don’t work for people who can’t use a mouse, people who can’t see a screen or for those who use one of the myriad of Assistive Technologies (AT) such as those you find at Mada (Qatar Assistive Technology Center). Twitter did something different. It allowed developers to create a range of different software to access the service (eg. Tweetdeck, Tweetie, Ubertwitter, etc.), much in the same way as we can use different ways to send and receive email, and that decision had a big impact on people with disabilities.

A great way for people with disabilities to access Twitter!

In 2009, Accessible Twitter was launched. Dennis Lembree the man behind Webaxe blog (Podcast and blog on practical web design accessibility tips), launched the service as an alternative to the main Twitter website. Andy Bryant, tech pundit, summed up Accessible Twitter in 2009: “You go along to the homepage, log in with your usual Twitter account details, and use it in exactly the same way as you would the regular site. All the functionality that you’d expect is there – the Tweet roll, your status, mentions & messages, plus access to search, trending topics and popular links.” But unlike the original Twitter – this one was accessible.

Accessible Twitter is great for both disabled people and those without a disability, it is fully keyboard accessible, it’s optimized for screen reader users, and its fully functional with Javascript disabled browser (popular setting for the Blind). Andy also mentioned that there are also some really nice touches that go the extra mile, such as audio cues when the character limit is almost reached (in addition to the visual counter).

It could be argued that Twitter should have been accessible from day one. In fact, it is hard to argue against that, and Accessible Twitter shows us how mainstream applications can be designed to support everyone. But perhaps it also shows us another route, based on a more free form style of development. We are all increasingly using different ways of accessing online services, through phones, computers and even digital televisions. By allowing developers to design for specific markets, Twitter spotted something else: that we will all need to have choices of tools, just like we do with our email.

So Happy Birthday Twitter, thanks for the service, thanks for letting Dennis create something so valuable and thanks for the insight that it has given me into the needs and desires of disabled people. Just to illustrate this – here are some of the most recent things I learnt from Twitter today:

“Sign Language Users See Signs and Read Words Simultaneously”

“Segways become mobility aid of choice for many disabled”

“I grew up with a legally blind Mom, and I’m grateful for it. It was part of what made me who I am today.”

Oh and by way, don’t forget to follow Mada on Twitter at @madaQATC.

Tasbo 3 - Noisemaking Ads

Posted December 5, 2010

Ok so ive been busy and its been a littlew whil since I have written a blog. But I want you all to get as mad as hell, stand up and shout - "I hate web ads with annoying sound effects" Im going to give this Tasbo to two in particular, the first is to the ubiquitous IMVU, I can live with the vaguely distasteful imagery of avatars in romantic clinches, but I cant live with the constant interference with my web browsing by your irritating sound effects, I dont need to have my attention drawn to the page by your noises. I was sitting browsing, a pop up window opened and these effects started. I searched desperately around the page trying to close it, before finding it was hidden a couple of layers down in another window. Just plain irritating. Actually another was worse, I browsed a TV listings page, the same advert appeared in three places on the webpage, everytime I silenced one ad another started its banal sounds. Two of those ads I needed to find  by scrolling to the lower section of a page to mute them as they couldnt be seen initially.

So they are bad enough, but there is someone worse, Chevrolet have started an ad campaign online for their Malibu range. Apparently the car has a remote controlled ignition. To prove this they have created a banner ad featuring a remote control and a car. Every 15 seconds or so the car pretends to start up with a crashing sound, muting the ad seems to make no difference as it refreshes regularly and starts all over again

These are irritating enough as it is, but are far worse for screenreader users, I can mute the whole PC, they need audio to follow the main content. Imagine that every time you read a book someone came an poured paint on your page to make it more difficult

These audio polluters are just bad news, irritating to all, and a real hazard to some. Lets get rid of them or at least have a browser setting that says mute webpage sound effects

Till the IMVU and Chevrolet consider yourself Tasbo'd 

Tasbo 2 - www.sketch.com.uk

Posted July 25, 2010

For those who haven’t come across the concept a while ago I proposed an “Anti award” I guess with a view to naming and shaming, not simply for products or services that were in accessible (there would be too many) but for those vendors, developers, manufacturers etc who seemed to take a deliberate even perverse decision to create something which was more of a crime against accessibility.

Tasbo’s are technology anti-social behavior orders, and the first was given to Amazon and the Authors Guild of America.

This award goes to a single, specific website, and is equally shared between the Site owners and the Site developers. The former should have had the common sense to look at the site and say “what ??? your joking, were not trying to stop people coming to the restaurant” and to the developers who simply should have known better

The site in question is  http://www.sketch.uk.com/  it is entirely programmed in Flash but that’s just the start of the problems.  First up youd better have broadband, and not an Iphone as it’s a large file to load and Apple mobile OS don’t support flash, we are then greeted with a series of animations that are visually confusing and which successfully animate the text on screen. This means that the text that you are trying to read moves as you read it, which includes becoming a mirror image of itself at times !

Trying to view menus is an experience, having found the link a transparent window opens over the current text and animations meaning that you are trying to read new text with an animation and old text beneath it

The worst thing is the restaurant has some great reviews on the web, it’s clearly well thought of a stylish and  innovative place to eat, but based on the website you might well decide that it really is just too much bother.

So having shown the website to a number of a people via networks and twitter we garnered a few judges reviews of the site – these included

“this site is an excellent candidate for a inaccessibility hall of shame”

“I'd say one of the worst websites in any category”

“I'd say one of the worst...”

So come on guys, im sure you can make it a little easier for me to give you my money because the pumpkin soup sounds great – but I only know that because someone else’s site told me !

 

View older posts »

Subscribe to my Access Newsletter

Join the Mailing List
Enter your name and email address below:
Name:
Email:
Subscribe Unsubscribe